Re: [PULL] seccomp update (next)

From: Kees Cook
Date: Wed Nov 26 2014 - 16:59:18 EST


On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 00:23:06 +1100 (AEDT) James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Kees Cook wrote:
>>
>> > Please pull these seccomp changes for next.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > -Kees
>> >
>> > The following changes since commit 5d01410fe4d92081f349b013a2e7a95429e4f2c9:
>> >
>> > Linux 3.18-rc6 (2014-11-23 15:25:20 -0800)
>> >
>> > are available in the git repository at:
>> >
>> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git tags/seccomp-next
>> >
>> > for you to fetch changes up to cb24de187b9a0717246f05afc0f2be070e075d80:
>> >
>> > seccomp: Replace smp_read_barrier_depends() with lockless_dereference() (2014-11-25 11:40:24 -0800)
>> >
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Improves SMP dereferencing with new macro.
>> >
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Pranith Kumar (1):
>> > seccomp: Replace smp_read_barrier_depends() with lockless_dereference()
>> >
>> > kernel/seccomp.c | 7 +++----
>> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> >
>>
>> This is what I get when pulling to my next branch:
>>
>> 9128 files changed, 468773 insertions(+), 340317 deletions(-)
>
> That would be because your tree is based on v3.17 and Kees' is based on
> v3.18-rc6 ...

James, I can base on whatever you like. I can do v3.17, or even
against your security-next. It seems everyone uses something
different. :)

Thanks!

-Kees

--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/