Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix suboptimal seek_{data,hole} extents traversial

[Dmitry Monakhov]

Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 05:25:34PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
>> It is rediculus practice to scan inode block by block, this technique
>> applicable only for old indirect files. This takes signifficant amount
>> of time for really large files. Let's reuse ext4_fiemap which already
>> traverse inode-tree in most optimal meaner.
>> 
>> TESTCASE:
>> ftruncate64(fd, 0);
>> ftruncate64(fd, 1ULL << 40);
>> /* lseek will spin very long time */
>> lseek64(fd, 0, SEEK_DATA);
>> lseek64(fd, 0, SEEK_HOLE);
>> 
>> 
>> Original report: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/16/620
>> 
>> ##################################
>> BTW: Why do we need i_mutex here?
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Note: this patch causes generic/285 to loop forever in inline-data
> mode.  My guess is in the special case handling of inline data in
> ext4_fiemap not playing well with this change, but I haven't had a
> chance to look deeply into this yet.
Correct, it is appeared I've missed inline case. Will fix.
BTW: this happens because xfstests-bld contains obsolete e2fsprogs-lib 1.41.14
>
> 					- Ted

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature