Re: [PATCH] xen: privcmd: schedule() after private hypercall when non CONFIG_PREEMPT
From: Luis R. Rodriguez
Date: Thu Nov 27 2014 - 13:47:01 EST
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm afraid we don't have much leg room.
Let me be clear, I still think putting some hypercalls in process
context *might help* but because of notes 1) and 2) I highlighted I
think this is the best we can do, with more information we should be
able to consider weighing pros / cons with actual metrics from
alternatives, without more information we're just shooting in the dark
and the last thing I want is to see APIs abused or setting precedents.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/