Re: [PATCH 1/1] bridge: Fix NAT66ed IPv6 packets not being bridged correctly

From: Bernhard Thaler
Date: Thu Nov 27 2014 - 14:33:25 EST

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: POSIX mutex destruction requirements vs. futexes"
Previous message: Borislav Petkov: "Re: [tip:x86/apic] x86, irq: Use cached IOAPIC entry instead of reading from hardware"
Next in thread: Pablo Neira Ayuso: "Re: [PATCH 1/1] bridge: Fix NAT66ed IPv6 packets not being bridged correctly"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

I tested Sven's patch in my setup and I think it should be safe to use
it. It is shorter and cleaner written and he submitted it earlier.

I will be happy to assist you or Sven if any further work is needed.

Regards,
Bernhard

On 03.10.2014 13:21, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Hi Bernhard,
>
> Sorry for taking a bit to get back to you with feedback. We've been
> discussing recently some changes in br_netfilter. Basically, to
> modularize it [1] and this has taken a while.
>
> Regarding your change. Sven Eckelmann (CC'ed in this email) sent a RFC
> out of the merge window that have remain tagged in my patchwork, you
> can find it here.
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/381027/
>
> I would like to see a submission that covers all NAT66 scenarios that
> we currenty support.
>
> Thanks.
>
> [1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.netfilter.devel/54234
>
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:40:09PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Bernhard Thaler <bernhard.thaler@xxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:27:28 +0200
>>
>> CC:'ing netfilter-devel and the netfilter maintainer, which is
>> probably the primary place this patch should have been submitted.
>>
>>> Ethernet frames are not bridged to correct interface when packets have
>>> been NAT66ed; compared to IPv4 logic in code, IPv6 code does not store
>>> original address (before NAT) on transmit to determine if packet was
>>> NAT66ed on receive to swap addresses back.
>>>
>>> Changes added in br_netfilter.c to store original address, compare
>>> against it and determine correct output interface. Changes needed in
>>> netfilter_bridge.h to store IPv6 address in pre-existing union.
>>> Export of ip6_route_input needed to use it in br_netfilter.c.
>>>
>>> Problem may only affect systems doing NAT66 and ethernet bridging at
>>> the same time. Tested in NAT66 setup on base of an ethernet bridge.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Thaler <bernhard.thaler@xxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/netfilter_bridge.h | 2 +
>>> net/bridge/br_netfilter.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>> net/ipv6/route.c | 1 +
>>> 3 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/netfilter_bridge.h b/include/linux/netfilter_bridge.h
>>> index 8ab1c27..3a9cdcd 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/netfilter_bridge.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/netfilter_bridge.h
>>> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>>> #define __LINUX_BRIDGE_NETFILTER_H
>>>
>>> #include <uapi/linux/netfilter_bridge.h>
>>> +#include <uapi/linux/in6.h>
>>>
>>>
>>> enum nf_br_hook_priorities {
>>> @@ -79,6 +80,7 @@ static inline unsigned int nf_bridge_pad(const struct sk_buff *skb)
>>> struct bridge_skb_cb {
>>> union {
>>> __be32 ipv4;
>>> + struct in6_addr ipv6;
>>> } daddr;
>>> };
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c b/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c
>>> index a615264..2ae3888 100644
>>> --- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c
>>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c
>>> @@ -35,6 +35,9 @@
>>> #include <net/ip.h>
>>> #include <net/ipv6.h>
>>> #include <net/route.h>
>>> +#include <net/ip6_route.h>
>>> +#include <net/flow.h>
>>> +#include <net/dst.h>
>>>
>>> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>>> #include "br_private.h"
>>> @@ -42,10 +45,18 @@
>>> #include <linux/sysctl.h>
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> -#define skb_origaddr(skb) (((struct bridge_skb_cb *) \
>>> - (skb->nf_bridge->data))->daddr.ipv4)
>>> -#define store_orig_dstaddr(skb) (skb_origaddr(skb) = ip_hdr(skb)->daddr)
>>> -#define dnat_took_place(skb) (skb_origaddr(skb) != ip_hdr(skb)->daddr)
>>> +#define skb_origaddr(skb) (((struct bridge_skb_cb *)\
>>> + (skb->nf_bridge->data))->daddr.ipv4)
>>> +#define skb_origaddr_ipv6(skb) (((struct bridge_skb_cb *)\
>>> + (skb->nf_bridge->data))->daddr.ipv6)
>>> +#define store_orig_dstaddr(skb) (skb_origaddr(skb) = ip_hdr(skb)->daddr)
>>> +#define store_orig_dstaddr_ipv6(skb) (skb_origaddr_ipv6(skb) = \
>>> + ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr)
>>> +#define dnat_took_place(skb) (skb_origaddr(skb) != \
>>> + ip_hdr(skb)->daddr)
>>> +#define dnat_took_place_ipv6(skb) (memcmp(&skb_origaddr_ipv6(skb), \
>>> + &(ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr), \
>>> + sizeof(struct in6_addr)) != 0)
>>>
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
>>> static struct ctl_table_header *brnf_sysctl_header;
>>> @@ -340,36 +351,6 @@ int nf_bridge_copy_header(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -/* PF_BRIDGE/PRE_ROUTING *********************************************/
>>> -/* Undo the changes made for ip6tables PREROUTING and continue the
>>> - * bridge PRE_ROUTING hook. */
>>> -static int br_nf_pre_routing_finish_ipv6(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>> -{
>>> - struct nf_bridge_info *nf_bridge = skb->nf_bridge;
>>> - struct rtable *rt;
>>> -
>>> - if (nf_bridge->mask & BRNF_PKT_TYPE) {
>>> - skb->pkt_type = PACKET_OTHERHOST;
>>> - nf_bridge->mask ^= BRNF_PKT_TYPE;
>>> - }
>>> - nf_bridge->mask ^= BRNF_NF_BRIDGE_PREROUTING;
>>> -
>>> - rt = bridge_parent_rtable(nf_bridge->physindev);
>>> - if (!rt) {
>>> - kfree_skb(skb);
>>> - return 0;
>>> - }
>>> - skb_dst_set_noref(skb, &rt->dst);
>>> -
>>> - skb->dev = nf_bridge->physindev;
>>> - nf_bridge_update_protocol(skb);
>>> - nf_bridge_push_encap_header(skb);
>>> - NF_HOOK_THRESH(NFPROTO_BRIDGE, NF_BR_PRE_ROUTING, skb, skb->dev, NULL,
>>> - br_handle_frame_finish, 1);
>>> -
>>> - return 0;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> /* Obtain the correct destination MAC address, while preserving the original
>>> * source MAC address. If we already know this address, we just copy it. If we
>>> * don't, we use the neighbour framework to find out. In both cases, we make
>>> @@ -527,6 +508,92 @@ bridged_dnat:
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/* PF_BRIDGE/PRE_ROUTING *********************************************
>>> + * Undo the changes made for ip6tables PREROUTING and continue the
>>> + * bridge PRE_ROUTING hook.
>>> + */
>>> +static int br_nf_pre_routing_finish_ipv6(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>> +{
>>> + struct net_device *dev = skb->dev;
>>> + struct ipv6hdr *iph = ipv6_hdr(skb);
>>> + struct nf_bridge_info *nf_bridge = skb->nf_bridge;
>>> + struct rtable *rt;
>>> + struct dst_entry *dst;
>>> + struct flowi6 fl6 = {
>>> + .flowi6_iif = skb->dev->ifindex,
>>> + .daddr = iph->daddr,
>>> + .saddr = iph->saddr,
>>> + .flowlabel = ip6_flowinfo(iph),
>>> + .flowi6_mark = skb->mark,
>>> + .flowi6_proto = iph->nexthdr,
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + if (nf_bridge->mask & BRNF_PKT_TYPE) {
>>> + skb->pkt_type = PACKET_OTHERHOST;
>>> + nf_bridge->mask ^= BRNF_PKT_TYPE;
>>> + }
>>> + nf_bridge->mask ^= BRNF_NF_BRIDGE_PREROUTING;
>>> +
>>> + if (dnat_took_place_ipv6(skb)) {
>>> + ip6_route_input(skb);
>>> + /* ip6_route_input is void function,
>>> + * no int returned as in ip4_route_input
>>> + * changes value of skb->_skb_refdst) on success
>>> + */
>>> + if (skb->_skb_refdst == 0) {
>>> + struct in_device *in_dev = __in_dev_get_rcu(dev);
>>> +
>>> + if (!in_dev || IN_DEV_FORWARD(in_dev))
>>> + goto free_skb;
>>> +
>>> + dst = ip6_route_output(dev_net(dev), skb->sk, &fl6);
>>> + if (!IS_ERR(dst)) {
>>> + /* - Bridged-and-DNAT'ed traffic doesn't
>>> + * require ip_forwarding.
>>> + */
>>> + if (dst->dev == dev) {
>>> + skb_dst_set(skb, dst);
>>> + goto bridged_dnat;
>>> + }
>>> + dst_release(dst);
>>> + }
>>> +free_skb:
>>> + kfree_skb(skb);
>>> + return 0;
>>> + } else {
>>> + if (skb_dst(skb)->dev == dev) {
>>> +bridged_dnat:
>>> + skb->dev = nf_bridge->physindev;
>>> + nf_bridge_update_protocol(skb);
>>> + nf_bridge_push_encap_header(skb);
>>> + NF_HOOK_THRESH(NFPROTO_BRIDGE,
>>> + NF_BR_PRE_ROUTING,
>>> + skb, skb->dev, NULL,
>>> + br_nf_pre_routing_finish_bridge,
>>> + 1);
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> + memcpy(eth_hdr(skb)->h_dest, dev->dev_addr, ETH_ALEN);
>>> + skb->pkt_type = PACKET_HOST;
>>> + }
>>> + } else {
>>> + rt = bridge_parent_rtable(nf_bridge->physindev);
>>> + if (!rt) {
>>> + kfree_skb(skb);
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> + skb_dst_set_noref(skb, &rt->dst);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + skb->dev = nf_bridge->physindev;
>>> + nf_bridge_update_protocol(skb);
>>> + nf_bridge_push_encap_header(skb);
>>> + NF_HOOK_THRESH(NFPROTO_BRIDGE, NF_BR_PRE_ROUTING, skb, skb->dev, NULL,
>>> + br_handle_frame_finish, 1);
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static struct net_device *brnf_get_logical_dev(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct net_device *dev)
>>> {
>>> struct net_device *vlan, *br;
>>> @@ -658,6 +725,7 @@ static unsigned int br_nf_pre_routing_ipv6(const struct nf_hook_ops *ops,
>>> if (!setup_pre_routing(skb))
>>> return NF_DROP;
>>>
>>> + store_orig_dstaddr_ipv6(skb);
>>> skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_IPV6);
>>> NF_HOOK(NFPROTO_IPV6, NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING, skb, skb->dev, NULL,
>>> br_nf_pre_routing_finish_ipv6);
>>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
>>> index f23fbd2..e328905 100644
>>> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
>>> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
>>> @@ -1017,6 +1017,7 @@ void ip6_route_input(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>>
>>> skb_dst_set(skb, ip6_route_input_lookup(net, skb->dev, &fl6, flags));
>>> }
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ip6_route_input);
>>>
>>> static struct rt6_info *ip6_pol_route_output(struct net *net, struct fib6_table *table,
>>> struct flowi6 *fl6, int flags)
>>> --
>>> 1.7.10.4
>>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: POSIX mutex destruction requirements vs. futexes"
Previous message: Borislav Petkov: "Re: [tip:x86/apic] x86, irq: Use cached IOAPIC entry instead of reading from hardware"
Next in thread: Pablo Neira Ayuso: "Re: [PATCH 1/1] bridge: Fix NAT66ed IPv6 packets not being bridged correctly"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]