Re: [PATCH 00/11] ARM: at91: remove !DT support for at91rm9200
From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Thu Nov 27 2014 - 18:12:43 EST
On Thursday 27 November 2014 18:12:43 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>
> As discussed some weeks ago, I prepared patches to switch sama5d[3-4] to
> multiplatform. We are still missing the SMC and matrix drivers to switch
> sam9 and rm9200.
I just looked at the drivers because I got curious, and to see if
there are still any low-hanging fruit, but I guess you already picked
them all ;-)
> The currently affected drivers are:
> - drivers/ata/pata_at91.c (SMC)
> - drivers/pcmcia/at91_cf.c (SMC)
I guess the SMC should live in drivers/memory with an interface
similar to mvebu-devbus.c?
Seems doable but nontrivial.
> - drivers/usb/gadget/udc/at91_udc.c (Matrix, this is the only one
> for sam9)
Is at91_matrix a pin controller? With the board files removed, the udc
driver has the only two remaining calls to at91_matrix_{read,write}
for setting the pullup, so that could be modeled as a trivial pinctrl
driver
> - sound/atmel/ac97c.c (that one is still not converted to DT anyway...)
This one seems fairly straightforward to do, including a DT binding,
but the result is still ugly as it supports the at32 chips that
do things very differently.
The patch below gets it to compile and should be enough as a replacement
once a compatible string gets added.
> - drivers/watchdog/at91rm9200_wdt.c (WIP, will be converted properly to
> an MFD)
I think we discussed this one before. Remind me why we can't just convert
it to use watchdog_register() for simplification and then move whatever
remains into the arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200_time.c file, or both
into drivers/clocksource.
Arnd
8<----
ASoC: atmel/ac97c: remove platform_data dependency
As at91 gets changed to multiplatform, we can't use the mach/cpu.h
header any more, but this is ok as it only gets used to check for
cpu_is_at32ap7000(), which arch/avr32.
In order to make the driver work without platform_data, this also
changes the reset gpio line handling so it can look up the gpio
descriptor from DT. It is still missing a compatible string and
a binding that describes the valid DT properties.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/sound/atmel/ac97c.c b/sound/atmel/ac97c.c
index b59427d5a697..4eec216b7f92 100644
--- a/sound/atmel/ac97c.c
+++ b/sound/atmel/ac97c.c
@@ -34,10 +34,10 @@
#include <linux/platform_data/dma-dw.h>
#include <linux/dma/dw.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_AVR32
#include <mach/cpu.h>
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_AT91
-#include <mach/hardware.h>
+#else
+#define cpu_is_at32ap7000() (0)
#endif
#include "ac97c.h"
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ struct atmel_ac97c {
void __iomem *regs;
int irq;
int opened;
- int reset_pin;
+ struct gpio_desc *reset_pin;
};
#define get_chip(card) ((struct atmel_ac97c *)(card)->private_data)
@@ -890,11 +890,11 @@ static void atmel_ac97c_reset(struct atmel_ac97c *chip)
ac97c_writel(chip, CAMR, 0);
ac97c_writel(chip, COMR, 0);
- if (gpio_is_valid(chip->reset_pin)) {
- gpio_set_value(chip->reset_pin, 0);
+ if (chip->reset_pin) {
+ gpiod_set_value(chip->reset_pin, 0);
/* AC97 v2.2 specifications says minimum 1 us. */
udelay(2);
- gpio_set_value(chip->reset_pin, 1);
+ gpiod_set_value(chip->reset_pin, 1);
} else {
ac97c_writel(chip, MR, AC97C_MR_WRST | AC97C_MR_ENA);
udelay(2);
@@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ static int atmel_ac97c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
- if (!pdata) {
+ if (cpu_is_at32ap7000() && !pdata) {
dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "no platform data\n");
return -ENXIO;
}
@@ -980,16 +980,18 @@ static int atmel_ac97c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto err_ioremap;
}
- if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->reset_pin)) {
- if (gpio_request(pdata->reset_pin, "reset_pin")) {
+ if (pdata && gpio_is_valid(pdata->reset_pin)) {
+ if (devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, pdata->reset_pin, "reset")) {
dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "reset pin not available\n");
- chip->reset_pin = -ENODEV;
+ chip->reset_pin = NULL;
} else {
gpio_direction_output(pdata->reset_pin, 1);
- chip->reset_pin = pdata->reset_pin;
+ chip->reset_pin = gpio_to_desc(pdata->reset_pin);
}
} else {
- chip->reset_pin = -EINVAL;
+ chip->reset_pin = devm_gpiod_get(&pdev->dev, "reset", 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(chip->reset_pin))
+ chip->reset_pin = NULL;
}
atmel_ac97c_reset(chip);
@@ -1113,9 +1115,6 @@ err_dma:
chip->dma.tx_chan = NULL;
}
err_ac97_bus:
- if (gpio_is_valid(chip->reset_pin))
- gpio_free(chip->reset_pin);
-
iounmap(chip->regs);
err_ioremap:
free_irq(irq, chip);
@@ -1170,9 +1169,6 @@ static int atmel_ac97c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct snd_card *card = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
struct atmel_ac97c *chip = get_chip(card);
- if (gpio_is_valid(chip->reset_pin))
- gpio_free(chip->reset_pin);
-
ac97c_writel(chip, CAMR, 0);
ac97c_writel(chip, COMR, 0);
ac97c_writel(chip, MR, 0);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/