Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: edma: Rename header file for dmaengine filter function definition

[Peter Ujfalusi]

On 11/27/2014 11:52 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 27 November 2014 20:46:12 Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>>
>> I see. With this series I did not planed to fix all edma related issues, just
>> as a start clean up the related header files. I would rather not add fixes to
>> mmc, spi, etc drivers since while you have valid point it is not in the scope
>> of this series.
>> Can we do the changes you are suggesting in an incremental manner?
> 
> Sure, but I'd leave the existing filter function declaration alone then
> and not move it, since we wouldn't want to keep it in the long run.

but if you want to reference the filter function (which is in
drivers/dma/edma.c) in arch/arm/mach-davinci/ directory, we will need it.
Don't we?

If I leave the header as it is, then how would we clean up the edma headers? I
would not put the API definitions for the arch code into the same file as we
have the filter definition.


> 
> 	Arnd
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


-- 
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/