Re: [PATCH 1/3] platform: x86: dell-rbtn: Dell Airplane Mode Switch driver

[Pali RohÃr]

Hello,

I will fix all those style problems and add some comments.

On Friday 28 November 2014 12:33:28 Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	rfkill_set_states(rfkill, !output, !output);
> 
> You can also write it like:
> 
> 	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> 		rfkill_set_states(rfkill, !output, !output);
> 
> which looks better to me at least.
> 

In whole module I'm using this style:

f1();
if (f1_failed)
	return;
f2()
if (f2_failed)
	return;

So I would like not to change it for one function.

> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rbtn_set_block(void *data, bool blocked)
> > +{
> > +	/* FIXME: setting soft rfkill cause problems, so disable
> > it for now */ +	return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct rfkill_ops rbtn_ops = {
> 
> static? const?
> 

Yes, static const should be used.

> 
> > +/*** module functions ***/
> > +
> > +static int __init rbtn_init(void)
> > +{
> > +	return acpi_bus_register_driver(&rbtn_driver);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void __exit rbtn_exit(void)
> > +{
> > +	acpi_bus_unregister_driver(&rbtn_driver);
> > +}
> > +
> > +module_init(rbtn_init);
> > +module_exit(rbtn_exit);
> 
> module_acpi_driver()?
> 

No, see PATCH 2/3.

-- 
Pali RohÃr
pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.