On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 09:18:00AM +0000, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
This patch adds a description of 'flashes' property
to the samsung-fimc.txt.
Signed-off-by: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/media/samsung-fimc.txt | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/samsung-fimc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/samsung-fimc.txt
index 922d6f8..4b7ed03 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/samsung-fimc.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/samsung-fimc.txt
@@ -40,6 +40,12 @@ should be inactive. For the "active-a" state the camera port A must be activated
and the port B deactivated and for the state "active-b" it should be the other
way around.
+Optional properties:
+
+- flashes - array of strings with flash led names; the name has to
+ be same with the related led label
+ (see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt)
+
Why is this not an array of phandles to the LED nodes? That's much
better than strings.
Also, I only seem to have recevied the documentation patches and none of
the code -- in future when posting RFC DT patches, please Cc for the
code too as it's useful context.