Re: [PATCH v3] media: usb: uvc: use vb2_ops_wait_prepare/finish helper
From: Prabhakar Lad
Date: Fri Nov 28 2014 - 12:07:31 EST
Hi Laurent,
Thanks for the review.
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Prabhakar,
[Snip]
>>
>> + queue->queue.lock = &queue->mutex;
>
> I'm a bit concerned that this would introduce future breakages. Setting the
> queue.lock pointer enables locking in all vb2_fop_* and vb2_ops_wait_*
> functions. The uvcvideo driver isn't ready for that, but doesn't use the
> vb2_fop_* functions yet, so that's not an issue. However, in the future,
> videobuf2 might use the lock in more places, including functions used by the
> uvcvideo driver. This could then cause breakages.
>
Even if in future if videobuf2 uses this lock it would be in helpers mostly,
so any way it doesnât harm :)
> It would be better to completely convert the uvcvideo driver to the vb2_fop_*
> functions if we want to use vb2_ops_*. I'm not sure how complex that would be
> though, and whether it would be possible while still keeping the fine-grained
> locking implemented by the uvcvideo driver. Do you think it should be
> attempted ?
>
mmap & poll should be fairly simple, looks like open & release cannot be dropped
as it does some usb_autopm_get/put_interface() calls which I am not aware of.
Thanks,
--Prabhakar Lad
>> ret = vb2_queue_init(&queue->queue);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/