[RFC PATCH 01/30] jiffies: Remove HZ > USEC_PER_SEC special case

From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Fri Nov 28 2014 - 13:32:01 EST


HZ never goes much further 1000 and a bit. And if we ever reach one tick
per microsecond, we might be having a problem.

Lets stop maintaining this special case.

Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/time/time.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/time.c b/kernel/time/time.c
index a9ae20f..e44f6f1 100644
--- a/kernel/time/time.c
+++ b/kernel/time/time.c
@@ -260,10 +260,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(jiffies_to_msecs);

unsigned int jiffies_to_usecs(const unsigned long j)
{
-#if HZ <= USEC_PER_SEC && !(USEC_PER_SEC % HZ)
+ /* Hz usually doesn't go much further MSEC_PER_SEC */
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(HZ >= USEC_PER_SEC);
+
+#if !(USEC_PER_SEC % HZ)
return (USEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * j;
-#elif HZ > USEC_PER_SEC && !(HZ % USEC_PER_SEC)
- return (j + (HZ / USEC_PER_SEC) - 1)/(HZ / USEC_PER_SEC);
#else
# if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
return (HZ_TO_USEC_MUL32 * j) >> HZ_TO_USEC_SHR32;
@@ -543,10 +544,8 @@ unsigned long usecs_to_jiffies(const unsigned int u)
{
if (u > jiffies_to_usecs(MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET))
return MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET;
-#if HZ <= USEC_PER_SEC && !(USEC_PER_SEC % HZ)
+#if !(USEC_PER_SEC % HZ)
return (u + (USEC_PER_SEC / HZ) - 1) / (USEC_PER_SEC / HZ);
-#elif HZ > USEC_PER_SEC && !(HZ % USEC_PER_SEC)
- return u * (HZ / USEC_PER_SEC);
#else
return (USEC_TO_HZ_MUL32 * u + USEC_TO_HZ_ADJ32)
>> USEC_TO_HZ_SHR32;
--
2.1.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/