On Mon, 08 Dec 2014, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday 08 December 2014 13:00:09 Lee Jones wrote:
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday 08 December 2014 12:06:19 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Today's linux-next merge of the bcm2835 tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile between commit 302a5ef29d49 ("ARM: BCM5301X:
Add DT for Netgear R6300 V2") from the arm-soc tree and commit
6298ed17a404 ("ARM: bcm2835: Add device tree for Raspberry Pi model
B+") from the bcm2835 tree.
I fixed it up (the bcm2835 tree patch is also in the arm-soc tree as
commit ba2a1d6959ac ("ARM: bcm2835: Add device tree for Raspberry Pi
model B+"), so I just used the arm-soc version) and can carry the fix
as necessary (no action is required).
Thanks a lot for the notification!
Lee, do you know what is going on? Did you accidentally rebase a commit
that you already sent for inclusion in arm-soc?
Nope. The branch hasn't changed at all.
OOI why would a re-base affect anything? I sent you it in patch form.
Ah, I looked at the wrong branch and didn't see that I applied a patch
instead of a pull request. It's all fine then, as long as you never
intend to send any pull requests based on top of your current branch.
You can possibly make Stephen's life a tiny bit simpler if you just
drop all patches from your for-next branch as soon as we've picked
them up into arm-soc.
That is something I thought about, but I believe we have users of that
branch. I guess we could always point them to ARM-SoC, or reset the
branch to the aforementioned.