Re: [PATCH 1/8] perf tools: Add feature check for libbabeltrace

[Jiri Olsa]

On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 05:07:23PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
> 
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +ifndef NO_LIBBABELTRACE
> > +  # for linking with debug library, run like:
> > +  # make DEBUG=1 LIBBABELTRACE_DIR=/opt/libdw/
> 
> s/libdw/libbabeltrace/

ouch.. copy&paste crap ;-)

> 
> 
> > +  ifdef LIBBABELTRACE_DIR
> > +    LIBBABELTRACE_CFLAGS  := -I$(LIBBABELTRACE_DIR)/include
> > +    LIBBABELTRACE_LDFLAGS := -L$(LIBBABELTRACE_DIR)/lib
> > +  endif
> > +  FEATURE_CHECK_CFLAGS-libbabeltrace := $(LIBBABELTRACE_CFLAGS)
> > +  FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-libbabeltrace := $(LIBBABELTRACE_LDFLAGS) -lbabeltrace-ctf
> > +endif
> > +
> >  # include ARCH specific config
> >  -include $(src-perf)/arch/$(ARCH)/Makefile
> >
> > @@ -201,6 +212,7 @@ CORE_FEATURE_TESTS =                        \
> >         stackprotector-all              \
> >         timerfd                         \
> >         libdw-dwarf-unwind              \
> > +       libbabeltrace                   \
> >         zlib
> >
> >  LIB_FEATURE_TESTS =                    \
> > @@ -216,6 +228,7 @@ LIB_FEATURE_TESTS =                 \
> >         libslang                        \
> >         libunwind                       \
> >         libdw-dwarf-unwind              \
> > +       libbabeltrace                   \
> >         zlib
> >
> >  VF_FEATURE_TESTS =                     \
> > @@ -661,6 +674,17 @@ else
> >    NO_PERF_READ_VDSOX32 := 1
> >  endif
> >
> > +ifndef NO_LIBBABELTRACE
> > +  ifeq ($(feature-libbabeltrace), 0)
> > +    msg := $(warning No libbabeltrace found, disables 'perf data' CTF format support, please install libbabeltrace-devel/libbabeltrace-dev);
> 
> It seems that Ubuntu has libbabeltrace-ctf-dev package.

ok

thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/