Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slave-dma tree with the arm tree

From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Tue Dec 09 2014 - 09:08:49 EST


Hi Krzysztof,

On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 14:38:48 +0100 Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Looks almost good:
> ++ pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(pl330->ddma.dev);
> ++ pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(pl330->ddma.dev);1
> ^here

Thanks for pointing that out, I have fixed it up for tomorrow.

> However I am looking current next (fetched few minutes ago and the one
> visible through gitweb) and I can see only mi changes (related to PM
> runtime). It looks like slave-dma changes got lost on the way.

Yeah, the slave-dma tree had another build problem so I used the
version of it from the previous day and so this conflict did not
actually occur today after all.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgpk10UvDBxFn.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature