[PATCH 8/8] s390/kvm: REPLACE barrier fixup with READ_ONCE
From: Christian Borntraeger
Date: Thu Dec 11 2014 - 09:06:56 EST
ACCESS_ONCE does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For
example gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag for such
accesses during the SRA (scalar replacement of aggregates) step
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145)
Commit 1365039d0cb3 ("KVM: s390: Fix ipte locking") replace
ACCESS_ONCE with barriers. Lets use READ_ONCE instead.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 18 ++++++------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
index 6dc0ad9..8f195fa 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
@@ -229,12 +229,10 @@ static void ipte_lock_simple(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
goto out;
ic = &vcpu->kvm->arch.sca->ipte_control;
do {
- old = *ic;
- barrier();
+ old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
while (old.k) {
cond_resched();
- old = *ic;
- barrier();
+ old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
}
new = old;
new.k = 1;
@@ -253,8 +251,7 @@ static void ipte_unlock_simple(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
goto out;
ic = &vcpu->kvm->arch.sca->ipte_control;
do {
- old = *ic;
- barrier();
+ old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
new = old;
new.k = 0;
} while (cmpxchg(&ic->val, old.val, new.val) != old.val);
@@ -269,12 +266,10 @@ static void ipte_lock_siif(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
ic = &vcpu->kvm->arch.sca->ipte_control;
do {
- old = *ic;
- barrier();
+ old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
while (old.kg) {
cond_resched();
- old = *ic;
- barrier();
+ old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
}
new = old;
new.k = 1;
@@ -288,8 +283,7 @@ static void ipte_unlock_siif(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
ic = &vcpu->kvm->arch.sca->ipte_control;
do {
- old = *ic;
- barrier();
+ old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
new = old;
new.kh--;
if (!new.kh)
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/