Re: [PATCH 0/7] slub: Fastpath optimization (especially for RT) V1

[Christoph Lameter]

On Thu, 11 Dec 2014, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:

> It looks like an impressive saving 116 -> 60 cycles.  I just don't see
> the same kind of improvements with my similar tests[1][2].

This is particularly for a CONFIG_PREEMPT kernel. There will be no effect
on !CONFIG_PREEMPT I hope.

> I do see the improvement, but it is not as high as I would have expected.

Do you have CONFIG_PREEMPT set?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/