Re: NULL pointer dereference in i2c-hid

[Benjamin Tissoires]

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Gabriele Mazzotta
<gabriele.mzt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thursday 11 December 2014 16:03:07 Mika Westerberg wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:58:01AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 06:04:51PM +0100, Gabriele Mazzotta wrote:
>> > > my laptop uses a touchpad that needs hid-rmi along with i2c-hid to work.
>> > > i2c-hid and hid-rmi can be loaded and unloaded independelty from each
>> > > other, however since 34f439e4afcd ("HID: i2c-hid: add runtime PM support")
>> > > if I unload hid-rmi and after it I also unload i2c-hid, I get a NULL
>> > > pointer dereference.
>> >
>> > I'll look into this.
>> >
>> > I can reproduce this easily with i2c-hid + hid-multitouch following your
>> > directions.
>>
>> Can you try the below patch?
>>
>> I think we shouldn't free buffers yet in ->stop() because we need the
>> command buffer sending power commands to the device. Also it seems that
>> ->start() re-allocates buffers anyway if maximum size increases.
>>
>> It shouldn't even leak memory as we release buffers at ->remove()
>> anyway.
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
>> index 62cec01937ea..68a8c938feea 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
>> @@ -705,12 +705,7 @@ static int i2c_hid_start(struct hid_device *hid)
>>
>>  static void i2c_hid_stop(struct hid_device *hid)
>>  {
>> -     struct i2c_client *client = hid->driver_data;
>> -     struct i2c_hid *ihid = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> -
>>       hid->claimed = 0;
>> -
>> -     i2c_hid_free_buffers(ihid);
>>  }
>>
>>  static int i2c_hid_open(struct hid_device *hid)

Mika,

you can add my Rev-by when submitting this patch to the mailing list.


>
> Yes, it works, thanks.
>
> This change seems to also prevent kernel ooops when I unload either
> i2c-hid or i2c-designware-platform while the touchpad is in use,
> thing that is likely to happen because of the other bug I reported.
>
> Speaking of it, does any of you have any suggestion on how to debug it?

Hehe, I coincidentally just replied to your bug with one patch to try
(that was proposed by the intel folks back in May[1]).
The powertop problem is IMO really worrying because the purpose of
i2c_hid was to reduce power consumption :)

Anyway, thanks for the quick test.

Cheers,
Benjamin

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4133771/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/