[patch 3/4] x86: pci: acpi: Fix the range check for IO resources
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Thu Dec 11 2014 - 14:48:51 EST
The range check in setup_res() checks the IO range against
iomem_resource. That's just wrong.
Move the check into a separate function and use ioport_resource for IO
ranges.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/pci/acpi.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Index: tip/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
+++ tip/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
@@ -240,12 +240,41 @@ static acpi_status count_resource(struct
return AE_OK;
}
+static bool valid_resource_range(struct resource *r, struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct resource *ior;
+ u64 end;
+
+ ior = (r->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) ? &ioport_resource : &iomem_resource;
+
+ /*
+ * Exclude non-addressable range or non-addressable portion of
+ * range. We only check end because ior->start is always 0.
+ */
+ end = r->end;
+ r->end = min(r->end, ior->end);
+ if (r->end <= r->start) {
+ dev_info(dev, "host bridge %s window [%#llx-%#llx] invalid range\n",
+ r->flags & IORESOURCE_IO ? "io" : "mem",
+ (unsigned long long)r->start, end);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ if (r->end == end)
+ return true;
+
+ dev_info(dev, "host bridge %s window [%#llx-%#llx] truncated to [%#llx-%#llx]\n",
+ r->flags & IORESOURCE_IO ? "io" : "mem",
+ (unsigned long long)r->start, end,
+ (unsigned long long)r->start, (unsigned long long)r->end);
+ return true;
+}
+
static acpi_status setup_resource(struct acpi_resource *acpi_res, void *data)
{
struct pci_root_info *info = data;
u64 translation_offset = 0;
struct resource r;
- u64 orig_end;
memset(&r, 0, sizeof(r));
if (!acpi_dev_resource_memory(acpi_res, &r)) {
@@ -269,31 +298,17 @@ static acpi_status setup_resource(struct
r.end += translation_offset;
}
- if (!is_valid_resource(&r))
+ if (!is_valid_resource(&r) ||
+ !valid_resource_range(&r, &info->bridge->dev))
return AE_OK;
- /* Exclude non-addressable range or non-addressable portion of range */
- orig_end = r.end;
- r.end = min(r.end, iomem_resource.end);
- if (r.end <= r.start) {
- dev_info(&info->bridge->dev,
- "host bridge window [%#llx-%#llx] (ignored, not CPU addressable)\n",
- (unsigned long long)r.start, orig_end);
- return AE_OK;
- } else if (orig_end != r.end) {
- dev_info(&info->bridge->dev,
- "host bridge window [%#llx-%#llx] ([%#llx-%#llx] ignored, not CPU addressable)\n",
- (unsigned long long)r.start, orig_end,
- (unsigned long long)r.end + 1, orig_end);
- }
-
r.name = info->name;
info->res[info->res_num] = r;
info->res_offset[info->res_num] = translation_offset;
info->res_num++;
if (!pci_use_crs)
dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &info->bridge->dev,
- "host bridge window %pR (ignored)\n", &r);
+ "host bridge window %pR ignored\n", &r);
return AE_OK;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/