On 12/11/2014 04:49 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:>Even if there was a good that wasn't, that last "bad" (6f929b4e5a02)
> So either one of those 'good's actually wasn't, or I'm just cursed.
is already sufficient just on its own to say that likely v3.16 already
had the problem.
Just do
gitk v3.16..6f929b4e5a02
and cry.
(or "git diff --stat -M v3.16...6f929b4e5a02" to see what that commit
brought in from the common ancestor).
So I'd call that bisect a failure, and your "v3.16 is fine" is
actually suspect after all. Which *might* mean that it's some hardware
issue after all. Or there are multiple different problems, and while
v3.16 was fine, the problem was introduced earlier (in the common
ancestor of that staging tree), then fixed for 3.16, and then
re-introduced later again.
Is it possible that Dave and myself were seeing the same problem after
all?
I'll go bisect it even further back...