Re: [PATCH] soc: tegra: pmc: restrict compilation of suspend-related support to ARM

[Paul Walmsley]

Hello Thierry

On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Thierry Reding wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:36:50PM +0000, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > 
> > Tegra SoCs with 64-bit ARM support don't currently support deep CPU
> > low-power states in mainline Linux.  When this support is added in the
> > future, it will probably look rather different from the existing
> > 32-bit ARM support, since the ARM64 maintainers' strong preference is
> > to use PSCI to implement it.
> > 
> > So, for the time being, prevent the CPU suspend-related code and data
> > in the Tegra PMC driver from compiling on ARM64.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <pwalmsley@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Allen Martin <amartin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Applies on next-20141209.
> > Intended for v3.20.
> > Boot-tested on Tegra124 Jetson TK1 on next-20141209.
> > Also boot-tested on Tegra132 Norrin FFD on next-20141209 + some unrelated 
> > patches.
> > 
> >  drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 7 +++++--
> >  include/soc/tegra/pm.h  | 2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> > index a2c0ceb95f8f..4bdc654bd747 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> > @@ -739,7 +739,7 @@ static int tegra_pmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) && defined(CONFIG_ARM)
> 
> I would slightly prefer having this as separate #ifdef lines to make it
> clearer that we're special-casing 32-bit ARM.

That's fine, I'll update that when the patch is reposted against 
v3.19-rc1.

> >  static int tegra_pmc_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >  {
> >  	tegra_pmc_writel(virt_to_phys(tegra_resume), PMC_SCRATCH41);
> > @@ -753,10 +753,11 @@ static int tegra_pmc_resume(struct device *dev)
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> > -#endif
> >  
> >  static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(tegra_pmc_pm_ops, tegra_pmc_suspend, tegra_pmc_resume);
> >  
> > +#endif
> 
> I don't think this is necessary, SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS will not use the
> supend or resume hooks if PM_SLEEP is disabled. 

PM_SLEEP is enabled by default for the ARM64 defconfig, and I don't plan 
to patch that out.

> > diff --git a/include/soc/tegra/pm.h b/include/soc/tegra/pm.h
> > index 30fe2078a547..03909101d4e7 100644
> > --- a/include/soc/tegra/pm.h
> > +++ b/include/soc/tegra/pm.h
> > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ enum tegra_suspend_mode {
> >  	TEGRA_MAX_SUSPEND_MODE,
> >  };
> >  
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) && defined(CONFIG_ARM)
> 
> Similarly to the above, I'd prefer this to be two separate lines. That
> also has the advantage that if we do add code for suspend/resume on 64
> bit ARM later on we don't need to untangle the conditional again.

I'm fine to change it, although it seems rather unlikely that this will be 
a significant issue.


- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/