RE: [CFT] Can I get some Tested-By's on this series?

[Chen, Hanxiao]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: containers-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:containers-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eric W.
> Biederman
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 7:20 AM
> To: Richard Weinberger
> Cc: linux-man; Kees Cook; Linux API; Linux Containers; Serge Hallyn; Josh Triplett;
> stable; Andy Lutomirski; Kenton Varda; LSM; Michael Kerrisk-manpages; Casey
> Schaufler; Andrew Morton; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [CFT] Can I get some Tested-By's on this series?
> 
> Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Am 10.12.2014 um 23:48 schrieb Serge Hallyn:
> >> Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx):
> >>>
> >>> Will people please test these patches with their container project?
> >>>
> >>> These changes break container userspace (hopefully in a minimal way) if
> >>> I could have that confirmed by testing I would really appreciate it.  I
> >>> really don't want to send out a bug fix that accidentally breaks
> >>> userspace again.
> >>>
> >>> The only issue sort of under discussion is if there is a better name for
> >>> /proc/<pid>/setgroups, and the name of the file will not affect the
> >>> functionality of the patchset.
> >>>
> >>> With the code reviewed and written in simple obviously correct, easily
> >>> reviewable ways I am hoping/planning to send this to Linus ASAP.
> >>>
> >>> Eric
> >>
> >> Is there a git tree we can clone?
> >
> > I was about to ask that too.
> > Hopefully I can tomorrow find some time for testing.
> 
> git pull git.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace.git
> for-testing
> 
> That holds my entire queue of fixes against 3.18-rc6
> 

Tested on Fedora20 with libvirt 1.2.11, works fine.

Tested-by: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
- Chen