Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: change where we report sched stats V2

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:37:09AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:

> >Yeah, so I don't like this, it adds overhead for everyone.
> >
> 
> Only if SCHEDSTATS is enabled tho, and it's no more overhead in the
> SCHEDSTATS case than before.  Would it be more acceptable to move the entire
> callback under SCHEDSTATS?

Nah, doesn't work. Distros need to enable the world and then some so
.config is a false choice.

> This is fine for discrete problems, but when trying to find a random latency
> spike in a production workload it's impossible. If I do
> 
> trace-cmd record -e sched:sched_switch -T sleep 5
> 
> on just one of our random web servers I end up with this
> 
> du -h trace.dat
> 62M     trace.dat
> 
> thats 62 megs in 5 seconds.  I ran the following command for almost 2 hours
> when searching for a latency spike
> 
> trace-cmd record -B latency -e sched:sched_stat_blocked -f \"delay >=
> 100000\" -T -o /root/latency.dat
> 
> and got the following .dat file
> 
> du -h latency.dat
> 48M     latency.dat

Ah, regardless what I think of our filter implementation, that actually
makes sense, let me ponder this a bit.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/