Re: [PATCHv7 0/3] Kernel Live Patching

[Balbir Singh]

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:44 AM, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2014, Balbir Singh wrote:
>
>> Could you describe what this does to signing? I presume the patched
>> module should cause a taint on module signing?
>
> Hmm, why should it?
>

I wanted to clarify it from a different perspective

If the base image is signed by X and the patched module is signed by
Y, is that supported. What does it imply in the case of live-patching?

Balbir Singh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/