Re: [PATCH 3/3] acpi:lpss:Refine lpss codes to fit acpi soc.

[Ken Xue]

On Tue, 2014-12-16 at 12:27 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Ken Xue <Ken.Xue@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Make a commit message not empty.
> 
[ken]got it.

> > Signed-off-by: Ken Xue <Ken.Xue@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 566 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
> >  1 file changed, 221 insertions(+), 345 deletions(-)
> >
> > -static int acpi_lpss_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > -                                    unsigned long action, void *data)
> 
> Could it be just a part of this file? It seems for me that AMD doesn't
> have anything specific which requires to have a dedicated power
> domain. Am I wrong?
> 
[Ken] AMD does not have any specific PM domain now. But i believe it is
a good and necessary feature for low power management. and AMD will have
similar HW design. so, can you share a reason to keep it as a part of
this file?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/