Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] ARM: socfpga: defconfig: enable fpga manager

[atull]

On Wed, 17 Dec 2014, Michal Simek wrote:

> On 12/17/2014 06:32 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:54:49AM -0600, atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> From: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Enable FPGA manager for Altera socfpga.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> v5: s/CONFIG_FPGA_MGR_ALTERA/CONFIG_FPGA_MGR_SOCFPGA/
> >> ---
> >>  arch/arm/configs/socfpga_defconfig |    4 ++++
> >>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/socfpga_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/socfpga_defconfig
> >> index a2956c3..f1d6a3b 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/configs/socfpga_defconfig
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/socfpga_defconfig
> >> @@ -86,6 +86,10 @@ CONFIG_USB_DWC2=y
> >>  CONFIG_USB_DWC2_HOST=y
> >>  CONFIG_MMC=y
> >>  CONFIG_MMC_DW=y
> >> +CONFIG_STAGING=y
> >> +CONFIG_FPGA=y
> >> +CONFIG_FPGA_MGR_SYSFS=y
> >> +CONFIG_FPGA_MGR_SOCFPGA=y
> >>  CONFIG_EXT2_FS=y
> >>  CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XATTR=y
> >>  CONFIG_EXT2_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
> > 
> > Do defconfigs really matter anymore?
> 
> If they want but anyway simply 5/6 and 6/6 shouldn't be the part of this series
> because they should go through arm-soc tree.
> 
> I will look at other patches tmr.
> 
> Monam, Insop: I think you should join this process because gs_fpgaboot
> should be one backend driver of this interface.
> 
> Thanks,
> Michal
> 

OK, we can drop 5/6 and 6/6 from this series.  I'll handle them 
separately.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/