RE: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: Support for switch port configuration

[Arad, Ronen]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: netdev-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:netdev-
> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Varlese, Marco
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 4:56 PM
> To: Roopa Prabhu
> Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Fastabend, John R; Thomas Graf; Jiri Pirko;
> sfeldma@xxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: Support for switch port
> configuration
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roopa Prabhu [mailto:roopa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 2:45 PM
> > To: Varlese, Marco
> > Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Fastabend, John R; Thomas Graf; Jiri
> > Pirko; sfeldma@xxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: Support for switch port
> > configuration
> >
> > On 12/18/14, 3:29 AM, Varlese, Marco wrote:
> > > From: Marco Varlese <marco.varlese@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Switch hardware offers a list of attributes that are configurable on
> > > a per port basis.
> > > This patch provides a mechanism to configure switch ports by adding
> > > an NDO for setting specific values to specific attributes.
> > > There will be a separate patch that adds the "get" functionality via
> > > another NDO and another patch that extends iproute2 to call the two
> > > new NDOs.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Marco Varlese <marco.varlese@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >   include/linux/netdevice.h    |  5 ++++
> > >   include/uapi/linux/if_link.h | 15 ++++++++++++
> > >   net/core/rtnetlink.c         | 54
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >   3 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > > index c31f74d..4881c7b 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > > @@ -1027,6 +1027,9 @@ typedef u16 (*select_queue_fallback_t)(struct
> > net_device *dev,
> > >    * int (*ndo_switch_port_stp_update)(struct net_device *dev, u8 state);
> > >    *	Called to notify switch device port of bridge port STP
> > >    *	state change.
> > > + * int (*ndo_switch_port_set_cfg)(struct net_device *dev,
> > > + *                                u32 attr, u64 value);
> > > + *	Called to set specific switch ports attributes.
> > >    */
> > >   struct net_device_ops {
> > >   	int			(*ndo_init)(struct net_device *dev);
> > > @@ -1185,6 +1188,8 @@ struct net_device_ops {
> > >   							    struct
> > netdev_phys_item_id *psid);
> > >   	int			(*ndo_switch_port_stp_update)(struct
> > net_device *dev,
> > >   							      u8 state);
> > > +	int			(*ndo_switch_port_set_cfg)(struct
> > net_device *dev,
> > > +							   u32 attr, u64 value);
> > >   #endif
> > >   };
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> > > b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h index f7d0d2d..19cb51a 100644
> > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> > > @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ enum {
> > >   	IFLA_PHYS_PORT_ID,
> > >   	IFLA_CARRIER_CHANGES,
> > >   	IFLA_PHYS_SWITCH_ID,
> > > +	IFLA_SWITCH_PORT_CFG,
> > >   	__IFLA_MAX
> > >   };
> > >
> > > @@ -603,4 +604,18 @@ enum {
> > >
> > >   #define IFLA_HSR_MAX (__IFLA_HSR_MAX - 1)
> > >
> > > +/* Switch Port Attributes section */
> > > +
> > > +enum {
> > > +	IFLA_ATTR_UNSPEC,
> > > +	IFLA_ATTR_LEARNING,
> > Any reason you want learning here ?. This is covered as part  of the
> > bridge setlink attributes.
> >
> 
> Yes, because the user may _not_ want to go through a bridge interface
> necessarily.

Some bridge attributes or more accurately bridge port attributes overlap with port attributes.
IFLA_BRPORT_LEARNING from IFLA_PROTINFO  and BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_PVID flag of IFLA_BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO from IFLA_AF_SPEC are two examples where bridge port properties might have to be mapped to a common or driver specific port attribute. 
Switch port driver that works without and explicit bridge device has to implement the bridge NDO's ndo_bridge_setlink/ndo_bridge_dellink.
It could take care of mapping such attributes from the bridge netlink message to either driver-specific port attribute of to an explicit one (assuming IFLA_ATTR_LEARNING would be accepted).
For example the driver could process the bridge learning information from the protinfo as such:

int sw_driver_br_setlink(struct net_device *dev, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
{
        struct nlattr *protinfo;
        protinfo = nlmsg_find_attr(nlh, sizeof(struct ifinfomsg),
                                   IFLA_PROTINFO);
        if (protinfo) {
                struct nlattr *attr;
                attr = nla_find_nested(protinfo, IFLA_BRPORT_LEARNING);
                if (attr) {
                        if (nla_len(attr) >= sizeof(u8)) {
                                if (nla_get_u8(attr))
                                        brport_flags |= BR_LEARNING;
                                else
                                        brport_flags &= ~BR_LEARNING;
                        }
                }
                /*
                 * Map bridge port attributes to driver-specific port attributes
                 */
        }
        return 0;
}

> 
> > > +	IFLA_ATTR_LOOPBACK,
> > > +	IFLA_ATTR_BCAST_FLOODING,
> > > +	IFLA_ATTR_UCAST_FLOODING,
> > > +	IFLA_ATTR_MCAST_FLOODING,
> > > +	__IFLA_ATTR_MAX
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +#define IFLA_ATTR_MAX (__IFLA_ATTR_MAX - 1)
> > > +
> > >   #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_IF_LINK_H */ diff --git
> > > a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c index
> > > eaa057f..c0d1c45 100644
> > > --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> > > +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> > > @@ -1389,6 +1389,46 @@ static int validate_linkmsg(struct net_device
> > *dev, struct nlattr *tb[])
> > >   	return 0;
> > >   }
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_SWITCHDEV
> > > +static int do_setswcfg(struct net_device *dev, struct nlattr *attr) {
> > > +	int rem, err = -EINVAL;
> > > +	struct nlattr *v;
> > > +	const struct net_device_ops *ops = dev->netdev_ops;
> > > +
> > > +	nla_for_each_nested(v, attr, rem) {
> > > +		u32 op = nla_type(v);
> > > +		u64 value = 0;
> > > +
> > > +		switch (op) {
> > > +		case IFLA_ATTR_LEARNING:
> > > +		case IFLA_ATTR_LOOPBACK:
> > > +		case IFLA_ATTR_BCAST_FLOODING:
> > > +		case IFLA_ATTR_UCAST_FLOODING:
> > > +		case IFLA_ATTR_MCAST_FLOODING: {
> > > +			if (nla_len(v) < sizeof(value)) {
> > > +				err = -EINVAL;
> > > +				break;
> > > +			}
> > > +
> > > +			value = nla_get_u64(v);
> > > +			err = ops->ndo_switch_port_set_cfg(dev,
> > > +							   op,
> > > +							   value);
> > > +			break;
> > > +		}
> > > +		default:
> > > +			err = -EINVAL;
> > > +			break;
> > > +		}
> > > +		if (err)
> > > +			break;
> > > +	}
> > > +	return err;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > >   static int do_setvfinfo(struct net_device *dev, struct nlattr *attr)
> > >   {
> > >   	int rem, err = -EINVAL;
> > > @@ -1740,6 +1780,20 @@ static int do_setlink(const struct sk_buff *skb,
> > >   			status |= DO_SETLINK_NOTIFY;
> > >   		}
> > >   	}
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_SWITCHDEV
> > > +	if (tb[IFLA_SWITCH_PORT_CFG]) {
> > > +		err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > +		if (!ops->ndo_switch_port_set_cfg)
> > > +			goto errout;
> > > +		if (!ops->ndo_switch_parent_id_get)
> > > +			goto errout;
> > > +		err = do_setswcfg(dev, tb[IFLA_SWITCH_PORT_CFG]);
> > > +		if (err < 0)
> > > +			goto errout;
> > > +
> > > +		status |= DO_SETLINK_NOTIFY;
> > > +	}
> > > +#endif
> > >   	err = 0;
> > >
> > >   errout:
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body
> of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/