Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/tls: Don't validate lm in set_thread_area() after all

[Andy Lutomirski]

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:59 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 12/18/2014 03:16 AM, tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> Commit-ID:  3fb2f4237bb452eb4e98f6a5dbd5a445b4fed9d0
>> Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/3fb2f4237bb452eb4e98f6a5dbd5a445b4fed9d0
>> Author:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> AuthorDate: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 14:48:30 -0800
>> Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> CommitDate: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:12:26 +0100
>>
>> x86/tls: Don't validate lm in set_thread_area() after all
>>
>> It turns out that there's a lurking ABI issue.  GCC, when
>> compiling this in a 32-bit program:
>>
>> struct user_desc desc = {
>>       .entry_number    = idx,
>>       .base_addr       = base,
>>       .limit           = 0xfffff,
>>       .seg_32bit       = 1,
>>       .contents        = 0, /* Data, grow-up */
>>       .read_exec_only  = 0,
>>       .limit_in_pages  = 1,
>>       .seg_not_present = 0,
>>       .useable         = 0,
>> };
>>
>> will leave .lm uninitialized.  This means that anything in the
>> kernel that reads user_desc.lm for 32-bit tasks is unreliable.
>>
>
> No, it won't.  However, if you initialize this dynamically field by
> field rather than as an initializer, then you are correct.
>

I tried the code above in function scope.

--Andy

>         -hpa
>



-- 
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/