Re: [RFC] i2c: designware: Avoid initcall and initialize the driver like a regular one

[Walter Lozano]

On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 03:15:49PM -0300, Walter Lozano wrote:
>> Currently, the driver is relying on a subsys_initcall() to register
>> the platform driver struct. This is typically done to allow early uses
>> of the I2C bus (for instance, I2C regulators used from early machine code).
>>
>> While this might work on some cases, it breaks on others. For instance,
>> I2C devices with GPIO-wired interrupts will fail to request the
>> interrupt because of this initcall usage.
>>
>> This commits attempts to fix the above issue, by converting the I2C
>> driver into a regular kernel platform driver. This guarantees it will
>> probe after GPIOs drivers.
>>
>> Platforms based on devicetree won't be affected by this change.
>
> Huh, why is that?
>
>> Legacy platforms, relying on the I2C being available early, might need
>> to implement proper defered mechanisms to overcome potential problems.
>
> NAK. We can't say "Let's cause a regression to force people to fix
> things that used to work" IMO. You exactly pointed out the problem that using
> subsys_initcall() creates.
>
> What about fixing the drivers you use to support deferred probing when
> acquitin the irq?

Yes, probably it is the best approach to avoid possible issues with
other drivers.
I'll check your suggestion.

Thanks for your comments.

Regards,

Walter

-- 
Walter Lozano, VanguardiaSur
www.vanguardiasur.com.ar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/