Re: [PATCH 1/2] MIPS: Move device-trees into vendor sub-directories
From: Andrew Bresticker
Date: Tue Dec 23 2014 - 11:41:29 EST
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 2014-12-22 15:27 GMT-08:00 Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>> Move the MIPS device-trees into the appropriate vendor sub-directories.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> arch/mips/Makefile | 2 +-
>>> arch/mips/boot/dts/Makefile | 33 ++++++++--------------
>>> arch/mips/boot/dts/bcm/Makefile | 9 ++++++
>>> arch/mips/boot/dts/{ => bcm}/bcm3384.dtsi | 0
>>> arch/mips/boot/dts/{ => bcm}/bcm93384wvg.dts | 0
>>
>> Let's use brcm here, which is the DT vendor prefix, or go full name
>> with broadcom, there has been enough debate in the past about this ;)
>
> IOW we want to see:
>
> arch/mips/boot/dts/brcm/bcm3384.dtsi
> arch/mips/boot/dts/brcm/bcm93384wvg.dts
>
> right? "brcm" for the vendor name, "bcmXXXX[X[X]]" for the chip
> names, just like the compatible strings.
Ok, I've renamed the "bcm" directory to "brcm" as you've described above.
> BTW, this will again create an ordering dependency with respect to my
> Generic BMIPS patch series. If Ralf can take Andrew's updated patches
> ASAP (since they're straightforward renamings) it will make it easier
> to add/rename platforms without having to fix up merge conflicts.
Yes, I'd like to get these in -next ASAP as I have work based on them
as well. V2 incoming...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/