Re: [PATCH] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: ti-bandgap.c: Remove unused function

[Nishanth Menon]

On 12/21/2014 11:43 AM, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> Remove the function ti_bandgap_write_thot() that is not used anywhere.
> 
> This was partially found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c |   13 -------------
>  drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.h |    1 -
>  2 files changed, 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> index 634b6ce..cbb6a5f 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> @@ -611,19 +611,6 @@ int ti_bandgap_read_thot(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id, int *thot)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * ti_bandgap_write_thot() - sets sensor current thot
> - * @bgp: pointer to bandgap instance
> - * @id: sensor id
> - * @val: desired thot value
> - *
> - * Return: 0 on success or the proper error code
> - */
> -int ti_bandgap_write_thot(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id, int val)
> -{
> -	return _ti_bandgap_write_threshold(bgp, id, val, true);
> -}
> -
> -/**
>   * ti_bandgap_read_tcold() - reads sensor current tcold
>   * @bgp: pointer to bandgap instance
>   * @id: sensor id
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.h b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.h
> index b3adf72..976afc0 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.h
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.h
> @@ -371,7 +371,6 @@ struct ti_bandgap_data {
>  };
>  
>  int ti_bandgap_read_thot(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id, int *thot);
> -int ti_bandgap_write_thot(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id, int val);
>  int ti_bandgap_read_tcold(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id, int *tcold);
>  int ti_bandgap_write_tcold(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id, int val);
>  int ti_bandgap_read_update_interval(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id,
> 

Not sure if removing support for programming of hot threshold is a
good idea. how about ti_bandgap_write_tcold then?


-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/