Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] memcg: add memory and swap knobs to the default cgroup hierarchy

[Vladimir Davydov]

On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 03:30:23PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> As such, my proposals would be:
> 
>   memory.low:        the expected lower end of the workload size
>   memory.high:       the expected upper end
>   memory.max:        the absolute OOM-enforced maximum size
>   memory.current:    the current size
> 
> And then, in the same vein:
> 
>   swap.max
>   swap.current
> 
> These names are short, but they should be unambiguous and descriptive
> in their context, and users will have to consult the documentation on
> how to configure this stuff anyway.

To me, memory.max resembles memory.max_usage_in_bytes from the old
interface, which is confusing. However, if we forget about the old
interface, the new names look fine.

Thanks,
Vladimir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/