Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: Add IMR support to Quark/Galileo

[Bryan O'Donoghue]

On 31/12/14 10:12, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue
> <pure.logic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This patchset adds an IMR driver to the kernel plus platform code for
>> Intel Galileo Gen1/Gen2 boards.
> 
> []
> 
>> Bryan O'Donoghue (2):
>>   x86: Add Isolated Memory Regions for Quark X1000
>>   platform/x86 Add Intel Galileo platform specific setup
> 
> I'm going to review this soon, but here few comments below.
> 
>>  arch/x86/Kconfig                     |  23 ++
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/imr.h           |  79 ++++++
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/intel-quark.h   |  31 ++
> 
> Could it be just a quark.h? Like for ce4100.
> Those intel- prefixes in the modules looks awkward especially when
> pathname consists x86 already.

Sure thing. I agree there's no real logic to prefixing with intel.


>>  arch/x86/kernel/Makefile             |   1 +
>>  arch/x86/kernel/imr.c                | 529 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig         |  15 +
>>  drivers/platform/x86/Makefile        |   1 +
>>  drivers/platform/x86/intel_galileo.c | 175 ++++++++++++
> 
> Here what about to make an hierarchy like:
> intel/galileo.c
> intel/mid/... would be those modules with intel_mid_ prefixes in
> future. See my proposal regarding to drivers/mfd [1]
> 
>>  8 files changed, 854 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/imr.h
>>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/intel-quark.h
>>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/imr.c
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel_galileo.c
> 
> 
> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1886819.html

That works for me will remember to include for V2.

BOD

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/