Re: [PATCH 5/5] perf diff: Fix -o/--order option behavior

[Jiri Olsa]

On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 02:06:33PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:

SNIP

> +		return 0;
> +
> +	fmt = zalloc(sizeof(*fmt));
> +	if (fmt == NULL) {
> +		pr_err("Memory allocation failed\n");
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +
> +	fmt->cmp      = hist_entry__cmp_nop;
> +	fmt->collapse = hist_entry__cmp_nop;
> +
> +	switch (compute) {
> +	case COMPUTE_DELTA:
> +		fmt->sort = hist_entry__cmp_delta_idx;
> +		break;
> +	case COMPUTE_RATIO:
> +		fmt->sort = hist_entry__cmp_ratio_idx;
> +		break;
> +	case COMPUTE_WEIGHTED_DIFF:
> +		fmt->sort = hist_entry__cmp_wdiff_idx;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		BUG_ON(1);
> +	}
> +
> +	list_add(&fmt->sort_list, &perf_hpp__sort_list);
> +	return 0;

so the first 'fmt' which gets to sorting is the one for
data__files[sort_idx] file, that sounds good..

but as the sorting goes through all the perf_hpp__sort_list list,
it will hit the 'sort_idx' data again.. should you disable sort
function for its 'fmt' then?

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/