Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod: Fix _wait_target_ready() for hwmods without sysc

From: Suman Anna
Date: Mon Jan 05 2015 - 14:54:19 EST


On 01/05/2015 02:35 AM, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> On Saturday 03 January 2015 02:40 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>> + Suman, lakml
>>
>> Hi Roger
>>
>> On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>
>>> Fixing up Paul's email id.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> -roger
>>>
>>> On 18/12/14 17:49, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>>> There are quite a few hwmods that don't have sysconfig register and so
>>>> _find_mpu_rt_port(oh) will return NULL thus preventing ready state check
>>>> on those modules after the module is enabled.
>>
>> Hmm. Any IP block that exposes registers that are accessible by the MPU
>> should have an MPU register target port, even if there's no SYSCONFIG
>> register. And if an IP block doesn't have registers that are accessible
>> from the MPU, then there shouldn't be much point to waiting for the module
>> to become ready.
>>
>> Looks like the real problem is the test for oh->class->sysc before the
>> call to _init_mpu_rt_base(). That was introduced by commit 6423d6df1440
>> ("ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod: check for module address space during init"). It's
>> not clear to me why that test was added, since _init_mpu_rt_base() doesn't
>> do anything with oh->class->sysc or SYSCONFIG registers.
> This was introduced by commit
> 97597b962529 (ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod: Don't call _init_mpu_rt_base if no sysc)

That's right, the test was present even before 6423d6df1440, I merely
made this a block.

> Patch description states that "there are few hwmod which doesn't have sysconfig registers and hence
> no need to ioremap() them in early init code".
> Isn't this correct?
> May be a dumb question: If IP doesn't have sysconfig, is there any case that hwmod does
> access the register address space of that IP? Why do we need to enable MPU register target port?
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Lokesh
>
>>
>> Could you please test the following patch?
>> I don't have an AM437x-gp-evm.
>>
>>
>> - Paul
>>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c | 12 ++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
>> index cbb908dc5cf0..ce6d11f3eda7 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
>> @@ -2451,14 +2451,10 @@ static int __init _init(struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *data)
>> oh->name, np->name);
>> }
>>
>> - if (oh->class->sysc) {
>> - r = _init_mpu_rt_base(oh, NULL, index, np);
>> - if (r < 0) {
>> - WARN(1, "omap_hwmod: %s: doesn't have mpu register target base\n",
>> - oh->name);
>> - return 0;
>> - }
>> - }
>> + r = _init_mpu_rt_base(oh, NULL, index, np);
>> + if (r < 0)
>> + pr_debug("omap_hwmod: %s: doesn't have mpu register target base\n",
>> + oh->name);
>>
>> r = _init_clocks(oh, NULL);
>> if (r < 0) {
>>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/