Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] x86, traps: Track entry into and exit from IST context

[Tony Luck]

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think you need ist_begin_non_atomic() before local_irq_enable() and
> ist_end_non_atomic() after local_irq_disable().  Otherwise it should
> be good.

In your x86/paranoid branch you added:

     prev_state = ist_enter(regs);
          .... body of do_machine_check() here ...
     ist_exit(regs, prev_state);

Does that override the previous advice? Or do I still need something before
I call local_irq_enable() and after local_irq_disable()?

-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/