Re: [PATCH 1/2] adjtimex.2: Update return value of adjtimex
From: Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Date: Tue Jan 06 2015 - 01:34:12 EST
Hello Masanari Iida,
On 12/24/2014 02:00 PM, Masanari Iida wrote:
> This patch update return value of adjtimex man page.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masanari Iida <standby24x7@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> man2/adjtimex.2 | 13 +++++++------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/man2/adjtimex.2 b/man2/adjtimex.2
> index eb3fda1..f2a8b8c 100644
> --- a/man2/adjtimex.2
> +++ b/man2/adjtimex.2
> @@ -109,12 +109,13 @@ returns the clock state:
> .PP
> .in +4n
> .nf
> -#define TIME_OK 0 /* clock synchronized */
> -#define TIME_INS 1 /* insert leap second */
> -#define TIME_DEL 2 /* delete leap second */
> -#define TIME_OOP 3 /* leap second in progress */
> -#define TIME_WAIT 4 /* leap second has occurred */
> -#define TIME_BAD 5 /* clock not synchronized */
> +#define TIME_OK 0 /* clock synchronized */
> +#define TIME_INS 1 /* insert leap second */
> +#define TIME_DEL 2 /* delete leap second */
> +#define TIME_OOP 3 /* leap second in progress */
> +#define TIME_WAIT 4 /* leap second has occurred */
> +#define TIME_ERROR 5 /* clock not synchronized */
> +#define TIME_BAD TIME_ERROR /* bw compat */
> .fi
> .in
> .PP
Thanks for your patch. Because of other recent changes to the page,
it does not apply, but I instead applied the patch below. Does
that look okay to you?
Thanks,
Michael
diff --git a/man2/adjtimex.2 b/man2/adjtimex.2
index 4b558b7..644e39b 100644
--- a/man2/adjtimex.2
+++ b/man2/adjtimex.2
@@ -305,8 +305,13 @@ Leap second in progress.
.BR TIME_WAIT
Leap second has occurred.
.TP
-.BR TIME_BAD
+.BR TIME_ERROR
Clock not synchronized.
+The symbolic name
+.B TIME_BAD
+is a synonym for
+.BR TIME_ERROR ,
+provided for backward comaptibility.
.PP
On failure,
.BR adjtimex ()
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/