[PATCH] sparc64: minor coding style tweaks
From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Date: Tue Jan 06 2015 - 16:40:19 EST
Sam Ravnborg suggested packing single-line cases
in nocheck switch statements makes for easier to
read code.
This is on top of arch/sparc: uaccess_64 macro whitespace fixes
that I sent earlier.
Suggested-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/sparc/include/asm/uaccess_64.h | 100 +++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/uaccess_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
index 12d9594..a35194b 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
@@ -106,26 +106,16 @@ void __retl_efault(void);
struct __large_struct { unsigned long buf[100]; };
#define __m(x) ((struct __large_struct *)(x))
-#define __put_user_nocheck(data, addr, size) ({ \
- register int __pu_ret; \
- switch (size) { \
- case 1: \
- __put_user_asm(data, b, addr, __pu_ret); \
- break; \
- case 2: \
- __put_user_asm(data, h, addr, __pu_ret); \
- break; \
- case 4: \
- __put_user_asm(data, w, addr, __pu_ret); \
- break; \
- case 8: \
- __put_user_asm(data, x, addr, __pu_ret); \
- break; \
- default: \
- __pu_ret = __put_user_bad(); \
- break; \
- } \
- __pu_ret; \
+#define __put_user_nocheck(data, addr, size) ({ \
+ register int __pu_ret; \
+ switch (size) { \
+ case 1: __put_user_asm(data, b, addr, __pu_ret); break; \
+ case 2: __put_user_asm(data, h, addr, __pu_ret); break; \
+ case 4: __put_user_asm(data, w, addr, __pu_ret); break; \
+ case 8: __put_user_asm(data, x, addr, __pu_ret); break; \
+ default: __pu_ret = __put_user_bad(); break; \
+ } \
+ __pu_ret; \
})
#define __put_user_asm(x, size, addr, ret) \
@@ -150,51 +140,35 @@ __asm__ __volatile__( \
int __put_user_bad(void);
-#define __get_user_nocheck(data, addr, size, type) ({ \
- register int __gu_ret; \
- register unsigned long __gu_val; \
- switch (size) { \
- case 1: \
- __get_user_asm(__gu_val, ub, addr, __gu_ret); \
- break; \
- case 2: \
- __get_user_asm(__gu_val, uh, addr, __gu_ret); \
- break; \
- case 4: \
- __get_user_asm(__gu_val, uw, addr, __gu_ret); \
- break; \
- case 8: \
- __get_user_asm(__gu_val, x, addr, __gu_ret); \
- break; \
- default: \
- __gu_val = 0; \
- __gu_ret = __get_user_bad(); \
- break; \
- } \
- data = (__force type) __gu_val; \
- __gu_ret; \
+#define __get_user_nocheck(data, addr, size, type) ({ \
+ register int __gu_ret; \
+ register unsigned long __gu_val; \
+ switch (size) { \
+ case 1: __get_user_asm(__gu_val, ub, addr, __gu_ret); break; \
+ case 2: __get_user_asm(__gu_val, uh, addr, __gu_ret); break; \
+ case 4: __get_user_asm(__gu_val, uw, addr, __gu_ret); break; \
+ case 8: __get_user_asm(__gu_val, x, addr, __gu_ret); break; \
+ default: \
+ __gu_val = 0; \
+ __gu_ret = __get_user_bad(); \
+ break; \
+ } \
+ data = (__force type) __gu_val; \
+ __gu_ret; \
})
-#define __get_user_nocheck_ret(data, addr, size, type, retval) ({ \
- register unsigned long __gu_val __asm__ ("l1"); \
- switch (size) { \
- case 1: \
- __get_user_asm_ret(__gu_val, ub, addr, retval); \
- break; \
- case 2: \
- __get_user_asm_ret(__gu_val, uh, addr, retval); \
- break; \
- case 4: \
- __get_user_asm_ret(__gu_val, uw, addr, retval); \
- break; \
- case 8: \
- __get_user_asm_ret(__gu_val, x, addr, retval); \
- break; \
- default: \
- if (__get_user_bad()) \
- return retval; \
- } \
- data = (__force type) __gu_val; \
+#define __get_user_nocheck_ret(data, addr, size, type, retval) ({ \
+ register unsigned long __gu_val __asm__ ("l1"); \
+ switch (size) { \
+ case 1: __get_user_asm_ret(__gu_val, ub, addr, retval); break; \
+ case 2: __get_user_asm_ret(__gu_val, uh, addr, retval); break; \
+ case 4: __get_user_asm_ret(__gu_val, uw, addr, retval); break; \
+ case 8: __get_user_asm_ret(__gu_val, x, addr, retval); break; \
+ default: \
+ if (__get_user_bad()) \
+ return retval; \
+ } \
+ data = (__force type) __gu_val; \
})
#define __get_user_asm(x, size, addr, ret) \
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/