Re: [PATCH 1/2] time: settimeofday: Validate the values of tv from user

From: John Stultz
Date: Wed Jan 07 2015 - 14:02:09 EST


On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 10:12:19AM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
>> From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> An unvalidated user input is multiplied by a constant, which can result in
>> an undefined behaviour for large values. While this is validated later,
>> we should avoid triggering undefined behaviour.
>>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> [jstultz: include trivial milisecond->microsecond correction noticed
>> by Andy]
>> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> include/linux/time.h | 13 +++++++++++++
>> kernel/time/time.c | 4 ++++
>> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> <formletter>
>
> This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
> stable kernel tree. Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
> for how to do this properly.
>
> </formletter>

Hrm. I'm not quite sure which rule I'm running afoul here.

Does this seem too much like a theoretical issue and not like enough
of a "oh, that's not good" issue?

thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/