Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: fix race condition in regulator_put()
From: ashayj
Date: Thu Jan 08 2015 - 07:58:10 EST
Thanks Mark for your review comments.
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 07:21:23PM +0530, Ashay Jaiswal wrote:
>
>> The regulator framework maintains a list of consumer regulators
>> for a regulator device and protects it from concurrent access
>> using the regulator device's mutex lock.
>
>> In the case of regulator_put() the consumer is removed without
>> holding the regulator device's mutex, resulting in a race condition
>> between any regulator operation which traverses the consumer list
>> and regulator_put() which releases the consumer regulator.
>> Fix this race condition by holding the regulator device's mutex while
>> removing and releasing the consumer regulator.
>
> This is a good spot thanks but I think your analysis here is missing a
> bit - it's not just the list manipulation that affects the rdev, it's
> also the reference count in the rdev and the exclusive flag. Indeed
> some of this issue applies on the _get() side too, while we do add the
> regulator to the list under the rdev mutex we don't have the mutex when
> we update the reference count meaning that we've got a potential issue
> with that. That *is* kind of separate though so could be dealt with in
> a separate patch.
>
I have updated the commit message as per your suggestion.
I will try to fix the regulator_get path.
> The lock region also seems too wide, the lock is only needed for the
> operations that affect the rdev not for the operations only on the
> object being freed - holding the lock for too long means impacting other
> users and some of the cleanup is potentially expensive. The comment at
> the top of the function needs updating too, it currently says that the
> lock is held in the caller but this applies only to the
> regulator_list_mutex.
>
Yes I too agree with your suggestion, updated the lock region to protect
only rdev parameters.
Also updated the comment on top of the _regulator_put function to reflect
regulator_list_mutex lock is held by caller.
I will upload next version of patch incorporating all the review comments.
Ashay Jaiswal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/