Re: [RFC 2/8] ARM64: Refactor kprobes-arm64

[Pratyush Anand]

On Thursday 08 January 2015 11:06 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 05:33:08PM +0000, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> > On Thursday 08 January 2015 10:25 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 03:21:18PM +0000, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> > > > Most of the stuff of kprobes-arm64.c can also be used by uprobes.c. So
> > > > move all those part to common code area. In the process rename kprobe to
> > > > probe whereever possible.
> > > >
> > > > No functional change.
> > >
> > > In which case, can you merge this into the kprobes series (which we haven't
> > > merged yet)?
> >
> > Yes, thats why these are just RFCs. I will send next version of uprobe
> > only after kprobe patches are accepted into maintainer's tree.
>
> Ok, but it also makes sense to make kprobes refactoring changes *before* the
> patches are merged, as that reduces churn in mainline whilst you don't have
> any other dependencies.

Sure, Sure.. I too expect first two patches to be merged with kprobe 
series. I just did that to develop my uprobe code.

~Pratyush

> Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/