On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 03:21:20PM +0000, Pratyush Anand wrote:
instruction_pointer_set is needed for uprobe implementation. Hence
define it for ARM64.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
index 24cc048ac3e7..29d9bf5e3635 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
@@ -206,6 +206,12 @@ static inline int valid_user_regs(struct user_pt_regs *regs)
#define instruction_pointer(regs) ((regs)->pc)
#define stack_pointer(regs) ((regs)->sp)
+static inline void instruction_pointer_set(struct pt_regs *regs,
+ unsigned long val)
+{
+ instruction_pointer(regs) = val;
+}
Do you think we could make use of the asm-generic ptrace header to get
this for free? afaict, we just need to implement GET_USP and possibly
GET_FP for the compat case (although it may well be that we still handle
the compat case entirely separately).
Will--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/