Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpio: dln2: use bus_sync_unlock instead of scheduling work

[Linus Walleij]

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Octavian Purdila
<octavian.purdila@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Octavian Purdila
>> <octavian.purdila@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Use the irq_chip bus_sync_unlock method to update hardware registers
>>> instead of scheduling work from the mask/unmask methods. This simplifies
>>> a bit the driver and make it more uniform with the other GPIO IRQ
>>> drivers.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Patch applied for fixes.
>>
>
> Hi Linus,
>
> I don't see the patch applied, could you please consider it for the
> -for-next branch?

Ah sorry I thought only the first patch was a critical fix.
Applied this to fixes too now. Working on queueing the
GPIO fixes.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/