Re: [PATCH v2] clk: Do not complain about correctly set read-only muxes when assigning clock parents from device tree

[Philipp Zabel]

Hi Stephen,

Am Donnerstag, den 08.01.2015, 13:32 -0800 schrieb Stephen Boyd:
[...]
> Why not do this in the core? As far as I can tell other drivers could
> run into the same problem, no? Does this work?
> 
> -----8<-------
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index f4963b7d4e17..3278645f4729 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -1677,16 +1677,18 @@ int clk_set_parent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *parent)
>  	if (!clk)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	/* verify ops for for multi-parent clks */
> -	if ((clk->num_parents > 1) && (!clk->ops->set_parent))
> -		return -ENOSYS;
> -
>  	/* prevent racing with updates to the clock topology */
>  	clk_prepare_lock();
>  
>  	if (clk->parent == parent)
>  		goto out;
>  
> +	/* verify ops for for multi-parent clks */
> +	if ((clk->num_parents > 1) && (!clk->ops->set_parent)) {
> +		ret = -ENOSYS;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
>  	/* check that we are allowed to re-parent if the clock is in use */
>  	if ((clk->flags & CLK_SET_PARENT_GATE) && clk->prepare_count) {
>  		ret = -EBUSY;

"[PATCH] clk: make set_parent succeed for any clock if the parent to be
set is the same as the current parent" ?

It works, but it also changes the API, as it makes
   clk_set_parent(some_non_mux, its_current_parent)
succeed instead of return -ENOSYS.

regards
Philipp

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/