Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] of: move of_dma_configure() to device,c to help re-use

[Rob Herring]

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thursday 08 January 2015 14:26:36 Murali Karicheri wrote:
>> On 01/08/2015 03:40 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 07 January 2015 17:37:56 Rob Herring wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Murali Karicheri<m-karicheri2@xxxxxx>  wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> +       ret = of_dma_get_range(np,&dma_addr,&paddr,&size);
>> >>> +       if (ret<  0) {
>> >>> +               dma_addr = offset = 0;
>> >>> +               size = dev->coherent_dma_mask + 1;
>> >>
>> >> If coherent_dma_mask is DMA_BIT_MASK(64), then you will overflow and
>> >> have a size of 0. There may also be a problem when the mask is only
>> >> 32-bit type.
>> >
>> > The mask is always a 64-bit type, it's not optional. But you are right,
>> > the 64-bit mask case is broken, so I guess we have to fix it differently
>> > by always passing the smaller value into arch_setup_dma_ops and
>> > adapting that function instead.
>> Arnd,
>>
>> What is the smaller value you are referring to in the below code?
>> between *dev->dma_mask and size from DT? But overflow can still happen
>> when size is to be calculated in arch_setup_dma_ops() for Non DT case or
>> when DT size is configured to be equivalent of DMA_BIT_MASK(64) + 1. Can
>> we discuss the code change you have in mind when you get a chance?
>
> I meant changing every function that the size values gets passed into
> to take a mask like 0xffffffff instead of a size like 0x100000000, so
> we can represent a 64-bit capable bus correctly.

Or you could special case a size of 0 to mean all/max? I'm not sure if
we need to handle size=0 for other reasons beyond just wrong DT data.

> This means we also need to adapt the value returned from of_dma_get_range.
> A minor complication here is that the DT properties sometimes already
> contain the mask value, in particular when we want to represent a
> full mapping like
>
>         bus {
>                 #address-cells = <1>;
>                 #size-cells = <1>;
>                 dma-ranges = <0 0 0xffffffff>; /* all 4 GB, DMA_BIT_MASK(32) */

This is wrong though, right? The DT should be size. Certainly, this
could be a valid size, but that would not make the mask 0xfffffffe. We
would still want it to be 0xffffffff.

We could do a fixup for these cases adding 1 if bit 0 is set (or not
subtracting 1 if we want the mask).

Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/