Re: [PATCH] Revert "tty: Fix pty master poll() after slave closes v2"
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Fri Jan 09 2015 - 16:41:12 EST
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 07:31:06AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 12/30/2014 07:17 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > This reverts commit c4dc304677e8d566572c4738d95c48be150c6606.
> > This fix is superseded by commit 52bce7f8d4fc633c9a9d0646eef58ba6ae9a3b73,
> > 'pty, n_tty: Simplify input processing on final close'.
> >
> > The final close now waits for input processing to complete before
> > destroying the pty, so poll() does not need to special case this
> > condition.
>
> Greg,
>
> As noted in this commit log, commit c4dc304677e8d566572c4738d95c48be150c6606,
> 'tty: Fix pty master poll() after slave closes v2', is not required
> after commit 52bce7f8d4fc633c9a9d0646eef58ba6ae9a3b73,
> 'pty, n_tty: Simplify input processing on final close'
>
> However, 'tty: Fix pty master poll() after slave closes v2' is appropriate
> for stable back to v3.12.
I don't understand, what needs to go to a stable tree and what doesn't?
confused,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/