On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 03:19 +1100, Emrys Bayliss wrote:Yes, this is wrong and will cause CTS to fail.
This patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl error:
rxtx.c:588: WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return
Signed-off-by: Emrys Bayliss <emrys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
index ea5140a..cc34704 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
@@ -553,8 +553,6 @@ static u16 vnt_fill_cts_head(struct vnt_usb_send_context *tx_context,
cpu_to_le16(IEEE80211_FTYPE_CTL | IEEE80211_STYPE_CTS);
memcpy(buf->data.ra, priv->current_net_addr, ETH_ALEN);
-
- return vnt_rxtx_datahead_g_fb(tx_context, &buf->data_head);
} else {
struct vnt_cts *buf = &head->cts_g;
/* Get SignalField,ServiceField,Length */
@@ -571,11 +569,9 @@ static u16 vnt_fill_cts_head(struct vnt_usb_send_context *tx_context,
cpu_to_le16(IEEE80211_FTYPE_CTL | IEEE80211_STYPE_CTS);
memcpy(buf->data.ra, priv->current_net_addr, ETH_ALEN);
-
- return vnt_rxtx_datahead_g(tx_context, &buf->data_head);
}
- return 0;
+ return vnt_rxtx_datahead_g_fb(tx_context, &buf->data_head);
}
static u16 vnt_rxtx_rts(struct vnt_usb_send_context *tx_context,
This is not the same code.
Does this even compile?
For the second block, you've changed
return <foo>_g(...) to <foo>_g_fb(...).