Re: [PATCH/RFC v10 02/19] Documentation: leds: Add description of LED Flash class extension

From: Jacek Anaszewski
Date: Mon Jan 12 2015 - 03:04:41 EST


Hi Pavel,

Thanks for the review.

On 01/09/2015 06:40 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!

The documentation being added contains overall description of the
LED Flash Class and the related sysfs attributes.

Signed-off-by: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Bryan Wu <cooloney@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@xxxxxxxxx>

+In order to enable support for flash LEDs CONFIG_LEDS_CLASS_FLASH symbol
+must be defined in the kernel config. A flash LED driver must register
+in the LED subsystem with led_classdev_flash_register function to gain flash
+related capabilities.
+
+There are flash LED devices which can control more than one LED and allow for
+strobing the sub-leds synchronously. A LED will be strobed synchronously with
+the one whose identifier is written to the flash_sync_strobe sysfs attribute.
+The list of available sub-led identifiers can be read from the

sub-LED?

Indeed, this naming will be more consistent.

+ - flash_fault - bitmask of flash faults that may have occurred
+ possible flags are:
+ * 0x01 - flash controller voltage to the flash LED has exceeded
+ the limit specific to the flash controller
+ * 0x02 - the flash strobe was still on when the timeout set by
+ the user has expired; not all flash controllers may
+ set this in all such conditions
+ * 0x04 - the flash controller has overheated
+ * 0x08 - the short circuit protection of the flash controller
+ has been triggered
+ * 0x10 - current in the LED power supply has exceeded the limit
+ specific to the flash controller
+ * 0x20 - the flash controller has detected a short or open
+ circuit condition on the indicator LED
+ * 0x40 - flash controller voltage to the flash LED has been
+ below the minimum limit specific to the flash
+ * 0x80 - the input voltage of the flash controller is below
+ the limit under which strobing the flash at full
+ current will not be possible. The condition persists
+ until this flag is no longer set
+ * 0x100 - the temperature of the LED has exceeded its allowed
+ upper limit

Did not everyone agree that text strings are preferable to bitmasks?

Pavel


I just forgot to update the flash_fault documentation. Will fix in the
next version.

--
Best Regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/