Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] ALSA: fix emu8000 DRAM sizing for AWE64 Value
From: Takashi Iwai
Date: Mon Jan 12 2015 - 03:26:58 EST
At Sun, 11 Jan 2015 16:08:58 -0500,
David Flater wrote:
>
> Applicable to any kernel since 2013:
>
> The special case added in commit 1338fc97d07a did not handle the possibility
> that the address space on an AWE64 Value would wrap around at 512 KiB. That
> is what it does, so the memory is still not detected on those cards.
>
> Fix that with a logic clean-up that eliminates the need for a special case.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Flater <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
I have a different "From" address (vger@xxxxxxxxxxxx) from this
sign-off. Which address should I take?
thanks,
Takashi
> ---
> History:
> 2015-01-11 v3: In response to feedback from Takashi Iwai,
> Patch 1: Repeat code to avoid goto middle of loop.
> Patch 2: Use pr_info not printk.
> Retested on CT4390 (4 MiB) and CT4380 (512 KiB).
> 2015-01-09 v2: In response to feedback from Takashi Iwai,
> 1. Optimize for diff size.
> 1a. Use goto to avoid indenting and repeating code.
> 1b. Jettison new debugging printouts.
> 2. Split printk into second patch.
> Retested on CT4390 (4 MiB) and CT4380 (512 KiB).
> 2015-01-08 v1 patch sent to LKML, Alsa Devel and maintainers. Tested on
> unexpanded CT4390 (4 MiB), CT4520 (512 KiB), and CT4380 (512
> KiB).
>
> sound/isa/sb/emu8000.c | 31 +++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/isa/sb/emu8000.c b/sound/isa/sb/emu8000.c
> index 45fcdff..d25e384 100644
> --- a/sound/isa/sb/emu8000.c
> +++ b/sound/isa/sb/emu8000.c
> @@ -378,13 +378,12 @@ init_arrays(struct snd_emu8000 *emu)
> static void
> size_dram(struct snd_emu8000 *emu)
> {
> - int i, size, detected_size;
> + int i, size;
>
> if (emu->dram_checked)
> return;
>
> size = 0;
> - detected_size = 0;
>
> /* write out a magic number */
> snd_emu8000_dma_chan(emu, 0, EMU8000_RAM_WRITE);
> @@ -392,10 +391,19 @@ size_dram(struct snd_emu8000 *emu)
> EMU8000_SMALW_WRITE(emu, EMU8000_DRAM_OFFSET);
> EMU8000_SMLD_WRITE(emu, UNIQUE_ID1);
> snd_emu8000_init_fm(emu); /* This must really be here and not 2 lines back even */
> + snd_emu8000_write_wait(emu);
>
> - while (size < EMU8000_MAX_DRAM) {
> + /*
> + * Detect first 512 KiB. If a write succeeds at the beginning of a
> + * 512 KiB page we assume that the whole page is there.
> + */
> + EMU8000_SMALR_WRITE(emu, EMU8000_DRAM_OFFSET);
> + EMU8000_SMLD_READ(emu); /* discard stale data */
> + if (EMU8000_SMLD_READ(emu) != UNIQUE_ID1)
> + goto skip_detect; /* No RAM */
> + snd_emu8000_read_wait(emu);
>
> - size += 512 * 1024; /* increment 512kbytes */
> + for (size = 512 * 1024; size < EMU8000_MAX_DRAM; size += 512 * 1024) {
>
> /* Write a unique data on the test address.
> * if the address is out of range, the data is written on
> @@ -431,18 +439,9 @@ size_dram(struct snd_emu8000 *emu)
> snd_emu8000_read_wait(emu);
>
> /* Otherwise, it's valid memory. */
> - detected_size = size + 512 * 1024;
> - }
> -
> - /* Distinguish 512 KiB from 0. */
> - if (detected_size == 0) {
> - snd_emu8000_read_wait(emu);
> - EMU8000_SMALR_WRITE(emu, EMU8000_DRAM_OFFSET);
> - EMU8000_SMLD_READ(emu); /* discard stale data */
> - if (EMU8000_SMLD_READ(emu) == UNIQUE_ID1)
> - detected_size = 512 * 1024;
> }
>
> +skip_detect:
> /* wait until FULL bit in SMAxW register is false */
> for (i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
> if ((EMU8000_SMALW_READ(emu) & 0x80000000) == 0)
> @@ -455,9 +454,9 @@ size_dram(struct snd_emu8000 *emu)
> snd_emu8000_dma_chan(emu, 1, EMU8000_RAM_CLOSE);
>
> snd_printdd("EMU8000 [0x%lx]: %d Kb on-board memory detected\n",
> - emu->port1, detected_size/1024);
> + emu->port1, size/1024);
>
> - emu->mem_size = detected_size;
> + emu->mem_size = size;
> emu->dram_checked = 1;
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/