Re: [PATCH] x86: introduce push/pop macros which generate CFI_REL_OFFSET and CFI_RESTORE
From: Andy Lutomirski
Date: Mon Jan 12 2015 - 14:26:10 EST
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:07:35AM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>> Sequences
>> pushl_cfi %reg
>> CFI_REL_OFFSET reg, 0
>> and
>> popl_cfi %reg
>> CFI_RESTORE reg
>> happen quite often. This patch adds macros which generate them.
>>
>> No assembly changes (verified with objdump -dr vmlinux.o).
>
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/dwarf2.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/dwarf2.h
>> index f6f1598..de1cdaf 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/dwarf2.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/dwarf2.h
>> @@ -86,11 +86,23 @@
>> CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET 8
>> .endm
>>
>> + .macro pushq_cfi_reg reg
>> + pushq %\reg
>> + CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET 8
>> + CFI_REL_OFFSET \reg, 0
>> + .endm
>
> What's wrong with adding the CFI_REL_OFFSET to the pushl/popl_cfi macro
> and not add two new _reg macros?
>
> I.e., have the _cfi macros add all the CFI annotations needed.
>
I think that some users don't want the CFI_REL_OFFSET. Also, there's
that pesky % sign.
--Andy
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
> Boris.
>
> Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
> --
--
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/