Re: [RFC PATCH 01/11] x86,fpu: document the data structures a little

[Rik van Riel]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/12/2015 04:18 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 04:46:23PM -0500, riel@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h @@ -400,6 +400,11 @@
>> struct xsave_struct { /* new processor state extensions will go
>> here */ } __attribute__ ((packed, aligned (64)));
>> 
>> +/* + * The FPU state used depends on the capabilities of the
>> hardware; the + * registers used for vector instructions on newer
>> hardware are included + * in the FPU state. + */ union
>> thread_xstate { struct i387_fsave_struct	fsave; struct
>> i387_fxsave_struct	fxsave; @@ -408,8 +413,8 @@ union
>> thread_xstate { };
>> 
>> struct fpu { -	unsigned int last_cpu; -	unsigned int has_fpu; +
>> unsigned int last_cpu;		/* FPU state last loaded on this CPU */
> 
> Isn't that the last CPU which had the FPU?

Indeed it is. Good catch. I will fix it.

>> +	unsigned int has_fpu;		/* FPU state in current use on CPU */
> 
> I understand ->has_fpu as this thread has the FPU. See comment
> over user_has_fpu().

It does that currently, but the patch to __kernel_fpu_start() changes it
so it can point to a kernel FPU state as well.

- -- 
All rights reversed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUtD7aAAoJEM553pKExN6D1TYH/34+5t9h+UxeVgqCxIAZuvAN
PY8r5PJMOdJb4hwbsbXfipA4oufRTXT3UrFYDUD2ASiJUv+P69FtXJgJRak0khJV
ZfOSXjnGA0WuTIWkTdXfl6H0RKxJd51Yc/EMgJL/kvnOucWBNjOPJnsWkQXrAan5
QJyM6WASFsUTjqAW3vzsKZwUmo/FnVh/FK/7pTVTqgZCI+j0WvitnGhD2J1A2Tvc
jlF2llmKQ/QxknW/HylurPAD4C68pw1AU08JcYtDmrRJGfweID/w5z+X3hd9xhjm
sEMjIKMTyrelj1K800uq0LXLw9gP7Vv7gNu6tMMWsle5wCTB0MrMH6/Qz3E/7Mk=
=5cE/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/