Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-time: decreasing the rating of the xen clocksource below that of the tsc clocksource for dom0's

[David Vrabel]

On 13/01/15 08:14, Imre Palik wrote:
> From: "Palik, Imre" <imrep@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> In Dom0's the use of the TSC clocksource (whenever it is stable enough to
> be used) instead of the Xen clocksource should not cause any issues, as
> Dom0 VMs never live-migrated.  The TSC clocksource is somewhat more
> efficient than the Xen paravirtualised clocksource, thus it should have
> higher rating.
> 
> This patch decreases the rating of the Xen clocksource in Dom0s to 275.
> Which is half-way between the rating of the TSC clocksource (300) and the
> hpet clocksource (250).

I'm happy with this but would like to see acks from those who objected
to v1.

David

> --- a/arch/x86/xen/time.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
> @@ -487,6 +487,10 @@ static void __init xen_time_init(void)
>  	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>  	struct timespec tp;
>  
> +	/* As Dom0 is never moved, no penalty on using TSC there */
> +	if (xen_initial_domain())
> +		xen_clocksource.rating = 275;
> +
>  	clocksource_register_hz(&xen_clocksource, NSEC_PER_SEC);
>  
>  	if (HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op(VCPUOP_stop_periodic_timer, cpu, NULL) == 0) {
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/